Hi Henrique,

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:18:02PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> OTOH, using -z9 on datasets smaller than the -z8 dictionary size *is* a
> waste of memory (I don't know about cpu time, and xz(1) doesn't say anything
> on that matter).  The same goes for -z8 and datasets smaller than -z7
> dictionary size, and so on.
 
> It is rather annoying that xz is not smart enough to detect this and
> downgrade the -z level when it is given a seekable file (which it can stat()
> and know the full size of beforehand).

This wouldn't seem too hard to implement in xz - have you asked upstream
about it?

Riku


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140925095914.ga4...@afflict.kos.to

Reply via email to