On gum, 2014-09-26 at 11:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that you appear to be filing several RC bugs against packages > which use /bin/bash shebangs in their scripts. > > These bugs are *not* RC. The packages themselves do not have security > issues. The interpreter they choose to use {may,does}, but that is not a > bug in grep, xz-utils or gzip. > > You should also know by now that mass bug filing without prior > discussion is discouraged, regardless of the severity. > > Finally, the rationale presented for the bugs - "against the debian > policy to use /bin/sh if possible" - is bogus. Debian Policy makes no > such requirement or even suggestion. It spells out what functionality > scripts using /bin/sh may rely on, it in no way implies that other > shells may not be used if appropriate shebangs and dependencies are in > place. > > Regards, > > Adam > >
I don't know what you're doing. Since I use bash I'm scared about this news. But doesn't the Unix specification explain how to reset terminals? Have you ever read this sentence: Read the fucking manual. If you have the manual could you send me a link to it? It's a kind of already seen something like this years ago. kind regards Joël -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1412060131.3467.22.camel@helix