Hi, I am looking into dbconfig-common RC bug 720517 [1] and I was wondering what the general idea is of maintainer scripts changing the permissions and/or owners of configuration files and the use of dpkg-statoverride. I myself find it unacceptable that updating a package changes the permissions/owners of a configuration file without asking, even when I have not documented that fact with dpkg-statoverride. At least that is how I read policy 10.7.3 [2].
Do other people find it sensible that you need to document this fact with dpkg-statoverride? In other words, is it ok to change permissions and ownership as done by dbconfig-common if you didn't? Paul [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720517 [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
