Ian Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > I hope you understand the rest of my mail, in which I said or implied:
> 1. Even if upstream disagrees, it should be obviously why dgit needs > the dgit git history to have identical contents to the Debian > packages. > 2. This dgit requirement is not difficult to work with (in part > because git makes it easy to do stunts). > 3. In particular the dgit git history can still have the upstream git > history as an ancestor, take cherry picks and even merges from > upstream git, etc. Oh, yes, absolutely. I even said basically the same thing in my earlier reply, pointing to gbp import-orig --upstream-vcs-tag, which creates exactly that structure. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
