On 11/04/2014 at 09:26 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joachim Breitner writes ("Re: Punctuation characters in Debian
> packaging"):
>
>> Am Montag, den 03.11.2014, 15:40 +0000 schrieb Ian Jackson:
>>
>>> There are probably a lot of things missing. If you know about
>>> some corner of Debian tooling which has exciting syntax, please
>>> add the information you have.
>>
>> apt-get supports appending - to a package name in its argument to
>> install to remove it; should such uses be listed on
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Punctuation?
>
> Um, please do list it but as `disputed' or `conflicting', because...
>
>> Also, is a package name ending in a - legal?.. Looks like they
>> are, according to the policy. I guess I can upload p-.-+-.- then
>> soon :-)
>
> ... yes, trailing `-' is permitted in a package name.
>
> Could apt use ! or ~ or something for this purpose ?The 'packagename-' syntax for 'apt-get install' and similar, and the 'packagename+' syntax for 'apt-get remove' and similar, are so well and so long established that I would argue against changing them at this point. As far as I can see, the only way those syntaxes have the potential to cause problems is if we ever have one (binary) package named 'packagename' and another named either 'packagename+' or 'packagename-'. In any other scenario, the current tools seem entirely capable of figuring out the correct thing to do without issues. As far as I am aware, there is not currently any such pair of packages. Would it be reasonable to write a requirement into some appropriate document (possibly Policy) forbidding such near-overlap package names, on account of this syntax? -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
