On Fri, 09 Jan 2015, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > The blank lines are not the only problem. Removing them would be a big > step forward, but the description would actually still be much too > long (more than 900 lines).
Lines aren't really the issue here; the primary one is space in the Packages file[1], and the secondary one is utility for users. Every extra line is only an extra byte, after all. It would probably be ideal if there was a better way of indicating which latex modules were in each texlive package than currently, but until a better method is found, this is probably the best of bad options. 1: By that I mean if we're going to make an arbitrary line in the sand in policy, it should be based on bytes, not lines. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Three little words. (In order of importance.) █████ █ ▌ ▞▀▖▌ ▌▛▀▘ █ ▌ ▌ ▌▝▞ ▛▀ you █ ▀▀▘▝▀ ▘ ▀▀▘ █████ -- hugh macleod "Three Words" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150109225613.ga10...@rzlab.ucr.edu