On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > I guess, changing semantics of bugnumber[-something]@b.d.o yet again > will not be considered.
Actually, I think that the way we handle nnn-* is pretty much wrong, but it's wrong for mainly historical and manpower reasons. I'm going to put together a bit more firm of a proposal in the next few weeks, but I think that basically everything but nnn-done@ and nnn-submitter@ should be no different from mailing nnn@, and until I allow submitters to opt out of e-mail, mailing nnn-submitter@ should be no different from e-mailing nnn@ either. I don't know what to do about contributors to a bug being e-mailed as well, but maybe even they should also be e-mailed by default... but I've been making the perfect the enemy of the good for too long here, I think. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com He was wrong. Nature abhors dimensional abnormalities, and seals them neatly away so that they don't upset people. Nature, in fact, abhors a lot of things, including vacuums, ships called the Marie Celeste, and the chuck keys for electric drills. -- Terry Pratchet _Pyramids_ p166 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150119000632.gj21...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
