+++ Paul Wise [2015-01-19 17:14 +0800]: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > > > I can understand your point of view and I think also the why but isn't > > that position the exception from the rule? That is shouldn't the process > > be optimized for the "common" case and allow the exception? > > The problem is that there is no common case. The only generality I can > think of is that people who have been around for a long time generally > want the status quo and new people who are usually used to other bug > trackers want to be subscribed by default.
I want to be subscribed to bugs I submit (by default). It annoys me that this doesn't happen and I miss replies or updates. Occaisionally I submit bugs I'm not actually very interested in, but that's not the usual case. Can someone remind me what the current rules are (or where it's written down). I know it doesn't work the way I expect it ought to, but I forget/never-understood exactly how it does work. Do maintainers always get the initial mail to a bug, but not the rest, unless they subscribe? That seems rather unhelpful if so (as illustrated by Mr Capper's frustration at the start of this thread) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150119092640.gc4...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
