Hello, I am the maintainer of python-scientific > How does this differ from the existing python-netcdf package?
I CC the upstream autor of python-scientific, maybe he can clarify this point but before a question to the netcdf4-python guyes. Does netcdf4-python will support python3 ? @Konrad do you think that this netcdf implementation from scientific python could be replace by this netcdf4-python implementation ? Should we get rid of your implentation and use this one instead (to be clear) It would be nice if at the end only one implementation could be kept and maintain. Cheers Frederic I put here the rest of the message: > That is not an easy question to answer (at least with my limited > knowledge). The Unidata website > (http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/software.html#Python) lists > 8 different python interfaces to NetCDF. Some are faster, and some offer > writing in reading & writing in other data formats as well as NetCDF. > The netcdf4-python package is the only one described as having > implemented most of the newest features of NetCDF-4. It was actually > modelled on the Scientific.IO.NetCDF module API. > The information about the ScientificPython source package which bundles > python-netcdf (along with many other modules useful for scientific > work), does not contain much easy to digest information about the > implemented interface. I did see in the changelog however, that it is at > least aware of NetCDF-4 data. > Basically, our intention was to package all of the netcdf-* packages > under the Unidata banner on github (https://github.com/Unidata). Regards, Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1feb...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
