Neil Williams, le Wed 06 May 2015 20:34:15 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 6 May 2015 20:36:25 +0200 > Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Neil Williams, le Wed 06 May 2015 12:03:30 +0100, a écrit : > > > If the patch *is* trivial and testable then it is up to the porters > > > to arrange a fully tested NMU. > > > > How can a porter fully test a package? Only maintainers really know > > their package well, testing a package is rarely documented. > > Anyone submitting a patch needs to at least be able to show that the > patch works and does not cause further bugs in the package. That means > at least testing the package -
Sure. I thought you meant more than that with "fully tested". > > (I'm sorry, but "just do all the work" is not welcoming, to me) > > That is a big warning sign right there. Where is the team? Where are > the other people driving this? Is it really just you? It's far from just me. If it was just me we would be very far from the current stage. -- Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150506204731.gm3...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
