On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:21:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guido Günther writes:
> > Having patches applied with 3.0(quilt) calls out for sync problems
> > between your git tree and debian/patches/. This can be mitigated with
> > --single-debian-patch --auto-commit but that's not what most people mean
> > when talking about 3.0(quilt) - and it kind of defeats it's purpose.
> 
> I think the problems you are describing arise when the user does _both_
> (a) manipulate the patches in debina/patches/ (with maybe quilt) _and_
> (b) manipulate the upstream code in git.

Yeah, but this happens easily with a patched tree and people having
different work flows.

> 
> Does git-buildpackage have a way to take a patches-applied git tree
> and turn it into a patches-unapplied form ?  If so then it might be

Yes, "gbp pq" does this.

> sensible for gbp users who want to publish a directly-useable git
> branch to treat the dgit branch as an export format: ie, to explicitly
> convert to it, and to convert _from_ it where necessary.

This could be done with a post-tag hook in gbp for the time beeing and
maybe move into the core if it proves useful.

That said, I have plans to make the "patch queue branch" pushable as
well - in that case we could use that directly.

Cheers,
 -- Guido


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150801124823.ga21...@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org

Reply via email to