[email protected] wrote: > >Hi, > >Finding the two checksums different. >Assuming they were regenerated. > >http://ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/archive/8.1.0/source/iso-dvd/SHA1SUMS >9b2f98144f68b45fe71cfbe6864ad5de07b01e7d > debian-update-8.1.0-source-DVD-1.iso > >http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/8.2.0/source/iso-dvd/SHA1SUMS >057d1e2894600f82a752c3219893de6402b5c15b > debian-update-8.1.0-source-DVD-1.iso > >Hope its not an issue !
Gah, sorry. The latter one was a mistake when generating the 8.*2*.0 update images - I missed an update in the config file and built something claiming to be 8.1.0 again. I hadn't realised the error escaped into the final 8.2.0 checksums files. Fixing... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
