On September 13, 2015 9:33:52 PM GMT-03:00, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> wrote: >On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote: > >> On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote: >> >>> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: >>> >>>>> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide >>>>> patches against your branch to implement/fix the issues I have >been >>>>> working on. It won't really matter much, I think: in the end, >we'll >>>>> have to use the "official" repository anyway and patch it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That would be highly preferred, simply for reviewing purposes. I'm >>>> also happy to rewrite parts of my history to, for example, not >include >>>> the -O--buildsystem stuff. But the existing git history is useful, >and >>>> I'd rather work from that. >>> >>> OK, I've done it: >>> >>> <http://git.sergiodj.net/?p=debian/midori.git;a=summary> >>> >>> It's the same link, but the repository is a new one, based on the >>> official repository. >> >> Just another update. >> >> I've re-created the repository above (the previous version contained >> some mistakes, and I thought it made sense to restart from scratch). >> Now, you can find the latest version of Midori (0.5.11, released a >few >> days ago) along with all the other changes that I had already made. >> >> Still builds successfully, and I'm using this latest version without >> problems. IOW, everything is ready to be used in Debian, and I'm >pretty >> happy with the current state of the repository. > >One (last?) update. > >I have upgrade/recreated the repository one more time now. Thadeu >Cascardo pointed me to two lintian warnings that I had not seen before >(they're fixed now), and I've cherry-picked Andreas's commits (those >that import the NMU-0.2 and merge it to master), so now I think >everything is *really* covered. Oh, and I've searched the BTS and >found >two bugs that requested a new version to be packaged, so I'm closing >them in the changelog. I intend to do a full bug triage once the >package is back to life. > >Just for the record, I've kept *all* history from the previous git >branches, so absolutely nothing is deleted nor lost. > >In other words, the package is ready to be re-uploaded. > >Thanks,
Thanks, Sergio. I find the repo and package in a good state for an upload. I will do it tomorrow night, if there are no further strong objections. Thanks Andres for his work as well, and all the others for their past contributions. Cascardo. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.