Hi, Thorsten Glaser wrote, > On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > It is a try to build a Debian system with an alternative C library > > That would require a new dpkg architecture and other changes, > e.g. you could build for linuxuclibc-i386 instead of linux-i386. > > The avr32 people tried to make a µClibc-based Debian port and > eventually failed, because the whole OS is much too dependent > on glibc and GNUisms, and because of the quality… > > The other libc ports (Debian/{free,net}bsd (as opposed to > Debian/kFreeBSD), the Interix port, the Minix port, etc.) > also mostly failed – sure, there are or were demonstrations, > but the limitations prevented them from ever taking off. > > > > Full disclosure: I do have commits in µClibc-ng. > > > > So you can further help to get stuff going ;) > > I’ve already told you I’d prefer to see it die, and the only > thing preventing that is nommu support in more sane libcs.
>From a good friend I would expect some more positive feedback for my hobby project ;) May be you should start to contact Rob Landley, he also wants to see uClibc/uClibc-ng die. You could start a new project together, how to kill uClibc/uClibc-ng project. What do you think about it? SCNR. best regards Waldemar