On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 25-01-16 19:47, Bastien Roucaries wrote: >> I expect more problems detected in the next few days > > I guess the autorejects for Multi-Arch: no are among those problems. > The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html > > The reject message refers to #768353 which was fixed in November 2014, > but the fix is most likely not available in stable yet, and hence still > an issue on the Debian infrastructure? > > If "Multi-Arch: no support in Debian is broken" is still true, the > suggested fix for old-style-config-script-multiarch-path is not an > actual solution. > > Should the autoreject be removed, or should lintian suggest a different fix?
This tag is not on autoreject list. My warning was about https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-json-evil.html, https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-cc-by-nc-sa.html, https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-non-free-img-lenna.html About you remark long term solution is here https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script.html Bastien > Kind Regards, > > Bas > > -- > GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 > Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 >
