-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for pursuing this, Daniel, and for being civil while doing so.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:47:46PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Chromium upstream are keen to discourage use of shared libraries on the > system and encourage packagers to bundle their own versions. This looks bad. But let me understand it: the sandbox they're talking about is a restricted part of the program that refuses to use any shared libraries? Would it work to statically link against the system library (as opposed to the bundled one)? As I understand it, they claim that what they bundle is identical to upstream, so that should work? Static linking isn't nice, but it's much better than using bundled libraries. A statically linked package just needs to be binNMUd to get an update. Thanks, Bas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWuh97AAoJEJzRfVgHwHE6NjoP/RAKLWVsH3xbt+Dr7JoPVzk6 GN9lMNdrSI4jFtIL9xDyn743k4dd85Urt8q2PPOk6vJdRyBFiw6gJ3UWA+9+jHq0 dvpjLEynrFY1rQnlMG//nYypacg0jYi95h+U2uT2PHu6yjVgwgBVxbz0hb6tQlmC i0z+hZ+W0WwIz7g9+PlbzQqQm6AmWL4t7yKC8u/l0+n84BwyI7G9DjOnmOsg9C7Z VZVp81y9h/bWKv3c5+QlDWb37Mxa30AETXQAHeWJTfZ+plZNBRkY0nVPOroMEnAM u2EOxKntzTHuFRtqEU1dk4nUWfhd+LJP2+10ditneq0VYac0Vhs8vHhnpLt5BBMg 44tkDPcBtb/OvIzN74knxT0I+N1bkFemvD/Te4b1EnM984nN1GATyLfMbF/tu2S8 Xny2nd7kAI3vD1RUyDgyWWzMwyS7NP8vmx9bZ6LTCxaVSH1j/NuJgJHW/3opdnch 4PXXBho2uz8tY2q3zqUy4LF1/ASX2WmYzyionN6Wx37g/NNhB1cZA3QLabL+Cgg0 x04v78p6ncekpBUWoCLBZI+EMacZIfbPTAJJPLNSXbb4AmYIvZ9wNufKv51nNGrY sTf1Wy4Ad+nHJhUcHPpcehSBkc17EPYR4himPLX1+44Sfr5rCYezxHMDWwXba4la ugxYBcMuM+ruiX326hOu =DEmJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----