-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:38:26AM -0700, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > On another Jessie machine I had to apply the same workaround to some > additional services. I identified the services that needed the workaround > by grepping for 'PrivateTmp' in /lib/systemd.
So any program that uses this option is broken? Doesn't that mean we should always disable it? Is there a reason that it is ever enabled for anything? Thanks, Bas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWujfyAAoJEJzRfVgHwHE6gH4P/ish9UZmNhBz6OcZ3RGkbSbO BEP2m/5kDwY2Vqbdn/ZNY6MNSuD6nx3AuVqslpeuysyvq/0N+EeyLEuJ5bcuP16G 2oSryre1XnqakMbdt+dauop/3jD29e+TtEBzP1Gpd7gXgOEWPrXA3kh6maFusUU8 aGFLjE6ndtR447VgB6xTf21xdAFWsS/Jfrosc1PjJ98fmXATsCpfXqXp+uiVPuG+ dL52dFyq61SwV1jqB5no+l9qWPlCPodwMUZL92StiMYlQ6zmgyiLLRQSbmaoiJLE CLn65gwitYmDKo19JvSOHeZcWWkWUeAT6n5WkbG0QQ60WqxCS0Zl+Otbj/dBEP+Y NJqk+GvYdr708MC09eDZ7+dOPA3NpQLzdu3Af6CmOTt6WsZ7kJEX2+yIGVi3jNCr PNX7P9uVE8FEhWUL/i1WlDVugYY7LbkOGRmn/YyuMZy8EHjHjzMvgg8oKqKFVjXi 4ABu8V9F5O4MsI41HRxKKhPJu8+DSCXeaKtkE/fqCzLu/3Oo6sjuViSjIcEmjWS2 f4M7i0JOM6EyaCk3AFujXfc9a66OiOondojcgPAZY1Wl6MENFyrLflR9NjN9dO1n P2KwgrtbwW2vgZgfbwjyMMuU6Ek7voP5JTjiBDMBphniBUudOAkLx49eUd4M1me2 bSaaGs+9comFByXuoRBL =ajY3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----