On 2016-04-09, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > I disagree that we need a new field: Simply lower to at most suggest the = > daemon: It is for the daemon to declare a stronger dependency. > Anyone needing the daemon can install the daemon - you shouldn't expect = > libraries to pull in daemons (just as you shouldn't expect documentation = > to pull in binaries).
Sometimes, the daemon is an implementation detail of the library. Or a hard requirement for the library to function. Sometimes it is even a hard requirement for the library to not crash. /Sune