-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:17:54PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 13, Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: > > We in Debian are in a good position to defend our users from the > > fallout from this problem. We could change our default compiler > > options to favour safety, and provide more traditional semantics. > Which would not solve any problem in this case, because then the HPC > users will just not use Debian or use custom optimized builds.
If users have such specialized needs, I think it is not only reasonable that they build their own versions of their libraries; I expect them to prefer that. So we should make that as easy as possible. I can imagine that Gentoo also seems attractive to them, and it may be a good (or even better) solution. But as Debian, I think the best we can do to help them is to make it easy to build our packages from source with custom build flags. I'm guessing that we're probably talking less than 100 people in the world, maybe less than 10, that need this. It makes no sense to put a package in the archive just for them. And changing the default compiler settings to fit their needs makes even less sense. Thanks, Bas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXDomkAAoJEJzRfVgHwHE6QfoP/R1gfb7vdZhPmICpevBc5/4O th5FSmNMb1W65gaVlOZlDhmIjoacL6Rgj0hJQuw7zMa7YUKE2O30/Hce+DPKaNiM OB7IEI5yywkyUUP5h9wMIXZP8LV+tsr9M77tgon+QBuJ2nURczvPqwtoKP/+/NEI PkzWnmbzixFaRPeBGQA76Iqn8/4YfhUN2aPTqDnVvZNCQyi9SxNLMbN/K5FYe8bB /vxx3tEfVDulPNeu0eHhx/n2lULJocCMiRWhkpyfGhMPtV+NkjYPI9hNpdhPIbIn MIqYP3rF9BIfabL9aLlcY/8FxlH/DmwR5cSzt9PtKLd0hL1mBRZ5+ef/L8QbkK/r 6nZDPh5/AYjnFXfZ5YJIj8+op2MCxQlcKnStvIAsXbC120mgxAOpERfWn+/j4QBQ g3NSoLqgWb0Eoo15TvtrQGHeHCtuE0o/vRECq4QGVFaD2pgaMfvFsM7ZRU6TR7El ilBqY4Ri/ct8msxAQ1NQLTsbzm9p2Dc9NnupiugT3or0OPRt4HDg7PO1xEZps4pV tjA49GKD9dqmHtZUSpV7nsaa+40KQzOQxqNtbi+6fryB3UgTColBjlVp5fcXBzYZ zD7zy5GN7LZimxYV8NeM92y9zcbS+CHMdTPayqeW2vH6MYUIAv6zDHijxpF67fld ZTNHMlLur4tFUWTrwtkg =atJe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----