>What would be troublesome was if Debian enabled any dangerous options by >default or promoted them too prominently without adequate warnings. >That does not seem to be the case here.
It seems to be the case here. At the least for Debian Installer, it doesn't have any warning like "Use btrfs on your own risk, it currently considered as experimental and unstable". 09.07.2016, 09:30, "Jonas Smedegaard" <d...@jones.dk>: > Quoting german...@ya.ru (2016-07-09 07:00:43) >> Probably my previous message was misunderstood, so I try to rephrase it. >> >> Current Debian Stable is Debian Jessie. The latest Linux kernel for Debian >> Jessie is 3.16. The said version of Linux kernel on the said version of >> Debian includes btrfs module. But documentation for this version of kernel >> says that "Btrfs is under heavy development, and is not suitable for >> any uses other than benchmarking and review. The Btrfs disk format is not >> yet finalized." (Proof-link: >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.txt?id=refs/tags/v3.16.36) >> So it should be expected that btrfs module for this version of Linux kernel >> is very buggy and dangerous. But on the other hand, somehow it managed to >> survive freeze phase and make its way into Debian Stable. >> >> How did it happen ?? O_o > > Debian provides many options - including dangerous ones. > > What would be troublesome was if Debian enabled any dangerous options by > default or promoted them too prominently without adequate warnings. > That does not seem to be the case here. > > - Jonas > > -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
