Marc Haber, on Sun 13 Nov 2016 11:37:13 +0100, wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:06:33 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote: > >I'm even willing to justify my opinion: Keeping testing in a state > >that can be released seems to be the only way in which we can make a > >release in a reasonable time frame. We've tried several other > >approaches, which haven't worked. The approach of "let's freeze and > >then try to fix things" didn't work. Let's not try it again. > > I do not think that it is a service to our users to release an > incomplete distribution just for the sake of keeping a date.
As said above, it's *not* a matter of "keeping a date", but "getting something out at all within reasonable time". Samuel
