On 08/12/16 13:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 08/12/16 13:02, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga >> >> nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so why >> can't my packages continue to list nagios3 as a possible dependency for >> the convenience of those people who continue to use it? > > I would need to check the code, but the auto-remover probably checks the first > dependency and ignores the rest (just like e.g. wanna-build and britney). So > you > could just swap them and make that: icinga | nagios3. >
OK, I will swap them in the next upload I try to backport things and it would help me minimize the workload if cases like this were tolerated in sid and testing. Regards, Daniel
