On Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:17:23 CET gregor herrmann wrote: > Ah, I see; that makes sense. So, perl6 X::Y::Z modules will use the > > > naming perl6-x-y-z? > > Yup, that's my understanding.
Yes, that's the plan. > > In any case, I don't have any objections to a new section; I just wanted > > to check about the alternative possibility of using "perl" (which in any > > case seems better than using "interpreters"). > > Ack. I just wanted to add my opinion that combining them with "perl" > doesn't seem to be a good idea. Agreed. Perl5 and Perl6 are considered by upstream as 2 different languages (even if of the same familly). That's why I think having 2 separate sections is preferable to match upstream's point of view. > And I'm not sure if we need perl6 _now_, given the amount of > packages. Yes, this can wait until jessie is released. I just hope to find the time to package Perl6 modules before Buster :-/ All the best -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org
