Thibaut Paumard writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"): > I'm not interested at the moment in dgit or other wrappers because > 1- they seem to me to add complexity to the process; > 2- I prefer to understand what I'm doing.
Those are good reasons. (And I'm trying to make them a bit less true.) But: dgit users (including downstreams) who use `dgit clone' to get your packages will appreciate it if you used `dgit push', because they will get (a slightly modified version of) your history, rather than just imports of .dsc's. Of course that's not of very much direct benefit to you. > Well, just to say, I'm personally quite happy with '3.0 (quilt)'. I try > to maintain all my packages in git in unapplied state, This is supported by dgit. Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.