On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:07:11AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > LOL, but I don't see a lot of social exclusion here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=sanv...@debian.org;tag=ftbfs-randomly > > Sometimes I've seen maintainers downgrade FTBFS bugs to "wishlist"! > > Surely I will not invite those maintainers to a party, but they are > still maintaining Debian packages. > > Should I ask the Technical Committee to rule out that FTBFS bugs are RC, > even if they did not happen in buildd.debian.org yet?
I'd say that all FTBFS bugs should be RC -- the maintainer requested (even if unintentionally) test failures to be fatal. If that's not your intent, write ||: after "make check". -- Autotools hint: to do a zx-spectrum build on a pdp11 host, type: ./configure --host=zx-spectrum --build=pdp11