Hi, Carsten Schoenert: > Starting with this thread and by some talking to various people I > changed my mind about this. For better flexibility and customizing, > thinking about various releases (like *-security, *-backports e.g.) that > need to be supported, I believe apparmor profiles for the applications > should stay in the belonging source packages in most cases.
Fully agreed. > Ubuntu is doing the opposite as far as I know [1], the time will show > which way is batter. FYI we're doing just like Ubuntu. I understand why you've been mislead — you're definitely not the first one — and Ulrike has documented where things are: https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/Contribute/Upstream#Debian_.2F_Upstream_relationship Cheers, -- intrigeri
