Hi, Ben Caradoc-Davies: > On 18/11/17 14:34, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> On 18/11/17 04:27, intrigeri wrote: >>> Thanks in advance, and sorry for any inconvenience it may cause (e.g. >>> the AppArmor policy for Thunderbird has various issues in sid; all of >>> those I'm aware of are fixed in experimental already). >> Where "various issues" means no thunderbird external helpers work under xfce. >> Not a single one, as far as I can tell. And there goes another one: what >> happened >> to my .signature? I have filed as many bugs as I can given the time >> available. >> I will file one more for the missing .signature, and then I am disabling >> apparmor.
Thanks. The last 9 days have taught us that it's too hard to confine Thunderbird with AppArmor meaningfully without breaking at least some common use cases. We've fixed a bunch of bugs but some use cases really can't be fixed without making the AppArmor policy essentially useless. Not a big surprise, it was probably worth trying, but let's be realistic and move on: Thunderbird will ship its AppArmor profile disabled by default soon (#882672); users may choose to opt-in. Cheers, -- intrigeri