On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Teams > ----- > > For larger projects you can also create a group to host your projects. > To avoid clashes with usernames (that share the same namespace as > groups) we are requiring groups to have a '-team' suffix to their > name. Groups can be created using the same self-service portal > https://signup.salsa.debian.org. For larger, already-established > teams it is also possible to ask us to create the group with a name > not conforming to the normal team namespace. Examples are teams like > *debian-qa*. Please create an issue in the support[1] project.
Is there a policy here? I'm seeing a mix of formats rather than any consistency. For example for keyring-maint should we request debian-keyring as a group, or just use keyring-team? DSA and ftp-master have gone for the latter (dsa-team + ftp-team) but I'd assumed the former was more appropriate for an official Debian entity. Likewise for pkg-electronics I was expecting pkg-electronics-team (to match, e.g., pkg-suricata-team) but I see things like libvirt-team as well so the pkg- prefix doesn't seem to be consistently used/unused. Guidance appreciated. I don't want to make an effort to move over and update URLs etc only to have to do so a second time because the team name wasn't of the correct format. J. -- 101 things you can't have too | .''`. Debian GNU/Linux Developer much of : 50 - Escalators. | : :' : Happy to accept PGP signed | `. `' or encrypted mail - RSA | `- key on the keyservers.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature