On 01/04/2018 01:33 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > Building without *libsystemd*, on the other hand, *is* invasive, > precisely because libsystemd *already* includes the necessary code to > handle systems without systemd, and building without libsystemd > duplicates that code. The correct response to a patch to build without > libsystemd is "no, that's what libsystemd exists for".
Does this approach also work for non-Linux ports? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
