>>>>> Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> writes: > 3.1 > 3.11 > 95 > 98 > 2000 > 1:5.1+XP # or 2001+XP or something > 1:5.2+Vista # or 2006+Vista or something > 1:7 > 1:8 > 1:8.1 > 1:10
> Ignoring the epoch would be actively harmful here: if you have a versioned > dependency on Windows >= 8, it would be incorrect for Windows 95 to > satisfy that dependency. At that moment, /me was enlightened.