❦ 1 mars 2018 11:59 +0530, Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> :
>> Does other ftp masters agree with this assessment of considering the >> size of the package as the only criteria to accept or reject a package? >> I don't agree with forcing other contributors to do extra, non standard, >> hacks instead of following the standards were applicable. >> >> node-three is the standard way for every node tools including webpack to >> find this package. Having to replicate this structure for every >> depending package is not acceptable. >> >> I have not objected to every rejection, where it made sense I have >> already embedded some modules (is-svg, unique-slug for example, and >> switching to a embed first and package on second dependency approach in >> general), but I don't agree with this case. > > It seems ftp masters are literally the masters with only a GR powerful > enough to over turn their decisions. See > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881339#55 > > I do not think this is really in sync with the rest of debian > philosophy. I think the following steps would improve the situation. > > 1. If a single ftp master is in disagreement, there should be a team > decision (in previous cases of disagreement also, other team members did > not get involved). > 2. CTTE should be able to overrule a delegate when there is a conflict > just like conflict between two debian developers. [...] In this specific case, can't you move the symlinks to nodejs-three package instead? -- Make the coupling between modules visible. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature