>> It just comes to my mind that Maybe it does not fit well with my convention >> for exeprimental numbering whcih is >> blablab_x.y.z-t~exp1 >> so maybe the best way would be to use >> blalbla_x.y.z-t~~alba+1
>So, you would not use the "bpo9" part for the packages built for stretch? Not at all, I would use the bpo, this is just that sometimes we use experimental in order to prepare transitions. And I use ~expN which is > ~alba+N So I am wondering if you want to create blabla_x.y.z-t~exp1~alba+1 just wondering. Cheers Fred