Hi James,

On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 06:20:03PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 03/06/18 16:08, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > Hi Debianites !
> > 
> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:23:33AM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> >> [libu2f-udev's post-inst script should make udev reload rules.]
> >> Otherwise, the rules are not active until the next reboot (or until the 
> >> user
> >> manually calls `udevadm control -R`).
> > 
> > To fix this bug, I need to call `udevadm` from the postinstall script,
> > meaning that libu2f-udev needs to Pre-Depends on udev.
> 
> Running a command from another package in postinst only requires a
> normal Depends - not a Pre-Depends.

OK.  I had assumed calling udevadm before udev was configured was wrong,
thanks for the clarification.


> However, I don't think you need to run "udevadm control -R" at all. udev
> will monitor rules from /lib/udev/rules.d while its running and
> automatically reload them when changed.

Interesting; when I tested libu2f-udev, I ran into cases where the rules seemed
not to be loaded yet, though it might be my testing was wrong.

I will likely keep the explicit reload, though, as I need the script anyhow.


> For the second half of this bug:
> > Consider investigating whether it is possible to apply the udev rules to
> > already-plugged-in devices (as setting tag uaccess should be idempotent).
> 
> This can be done by running "udevadm trigger". By default every device
> on the system will be triggered which is a bit heavyweight, so you
> probably want to add some *match parameters to restrict this to the
> devices you're interested in (see the udevadm man page).

Yes, I wrote a bash abomination which parses the installed rules and issues
a series of `udevadm trigger` calls with the right filters  :)

  
https://salsa.debian.org/auth-team/libu2f-host/commit/c9ef9a71415ef69ab2cf872473f1d875b0293df9


Thanks again for the feedback, I will just remove the Pre-Depends (and make it
a regular Depends).


Best,

  nicoo


Reply via email to