Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"): > > On 2018/10/25 12:24, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"): > >>> My main concern here is this: AFAICT this package has been REJECTed > >>> solely for this reason. Why is this bug[1] a reason for a REJECT ? > >>> ISTM that it should be filed in the BTS and handled like a normal bug. > >> > >> Ping, ftpmaster ? ... > Since you are cc'ing d-devel@, I'll chime in. > > I'm not sure I understand the first concern. The package name is libjulia1, > which would indeed normally point to a libjulia.so.1 library. You ship this: ...
Thanks for the technical details, but this does not seem to answer my question which is: Why is any of this a reason for an ftpmaster REJECT ? I still think all of this should be handled as bugs (possibly RC bugs) in the BTS in the conventional way, after ACCEPT. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.