Le jeudi, 22 novembre 2018, 00.17:54 h CET Michael Stone a écrit : > Then this needs to be a very explicit (and much better advertised) > decision, and it needs a much, much better implementation.
You keep referring to usrmerge as buggy: > The current usrmerge package has no test mode, will bail with a partially- > converted system if it runs into problems, and has no way to revert the > process. Sorry to be blunt about this, but have you reported these? Sniping at (any) package without making the problems you see visible to others (through bugs) is not really helpful. > Pulling in usrmerge during an upgrade isn't going to cut it--we'd need some > kind of pre-upgrade check that tells people what they need to fix before we > break it. Designing this in a hurry less than two months before we start > freezing seems incredibly ambitious. usrmerge is in the archive for 3+ years now. What seems to be needed now is for a lot of us to actually _try_ it, find and report bugs, and get this through. Don't forget that a specificity of our bug report system is that the only measure of "it worked without issues" that we have is popcon; we only get a measure of how much things fail, not how good they work: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=usrmerge (Funnily enough, it seems to have had a recent spike…) Cheers, OdyX