On 05.12.18 20:19, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 04-12-2018 20:03, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: >> as mandated by the policy, i'd like to discuss, whether an epoch bump >> for the new source package "pd-csound" (to be "2:1.01.0-1") is >> warranted, or indeed a good idea. > > Can at least the source package not carry the any special epoch, or is > that too confusing? >
is there any advantage of this? the source package currently only builds a single binary package (and i don't expect this to change). so i think that having different version numbers for source and binary package to only add complexity to the packaging with little gain. i have already uploaded to NEW yesterday (after the discussion here seemed to indicate consensus on the epoch bump), but of course it's awaiting ftp-masters' approval, so there is still time to re-upload. fgamsdr IOhannes