On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 10:43 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > I wonder whether we'd accept a developer's assertion that some large pdf > in a source package could be rebuilt without actually rebuilding it on > every upload.
As I understand it, ftp-master policy is that things in main be buildable from source using only tools in main, not that everything in main is actually built from source at `debian/rules build` time. There are plenty of things in the archive that we do not build from source on the buildds, firmware-linux-free for example. Obviously the best way to prove things are buildable from source is to actually build from source and do it as often as possible. Personally I'd like: * A standard build profile used when building everything from source. * A way to tell debian/rules to build everything from source. * A build toolchain option to make use of these. * A requirement that things not built from source come in a separate component tarball of the source package, using the multi-tarball feature of the v3 Debian source package format. * More upstream separation of build products from source. > I think we probably would. Personally I do not think it would be acceptable to not build large PDFs from source. I doubt the PDF build process could be problematic enough that we couldn't do it on current buildds. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part