On 02.06.19 16:22, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Nikolaus" == Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> writes: > > > Yes, but the lack of similarity is the thing I find interesting. > In git-pdm (and git-debrebase), you retain all the rebases and stitch > them together with various pseudo-merges into a combined history. > > If you could avoid that and have a more pure rebase workflow, I think it > would be nice. > As Ian points out, we don't know how to do that because we don't know > how to figure out whether you have the latest rebase.
Could you give me some more details on the intended workflow ? Why does one need that information at all ? --mtx -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering i...@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287