On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:30:46AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I admit under the circumstances you describe DEP-14 has advantages over > > default gbp. I'm not sure how productive it would be for teams with > > about 1000 packages to change the repository layout (posssibly its > > scriptable) just to reach more inter-team uniformity. I personally > > considered a good idea to stick to gbp default. In case gbp might > > change that default I'd consider to follow that change. > > I don't have an opinion on this. It is obviously suboptimal that on > branch naming we have both > 1. a document claiming to set out best practice > 2. a very widely used tool > which contradict each other.
That's a very good summary of the current situation. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de