On 13/9/19 15:20, Bastian Blank wrote: > For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin. With the CI people we > have to work through too much problems first.
If there are _too much problems_ I think you should, at least, communicate with us. Besides two issues[0][1] reported some time ago -which are both waiting for your feedback- nobody has reached us. You are more than welcome to write us so we can talk about the best way to continue. Forbidding something you don't like without further explanation doesn't seem to be the best way to go (applies to all Salsa matters). On 13/9/19 18:00, Sam Hartman wrote: > I'll remove it from the next version. I hope we can discuss this a bit further. There's a lot of work invested on the project and the main goal is to increase Debian's workflow quality. > On 13/9/19 18:00, Sam Hartman wrote: > Are there additional resources either the salsa admins or the salsa CI > team needs to move forward to a place where you'd both feel comfortable > recommending Salsa CI? It would be great to find a way to discuss things between Salsa admins and users. It's been one way only so far. Thanks. 0_ https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/issues/93 1_ https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/issues/94 -- - ina
