On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:04:14 +0200, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote: >On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 13:07:09 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >> > On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote: >> > > How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can be force >> > > pushed any time and people pulling from those branches should be >> > > expected to handle that? >> > >> > This would be useful. >> > >> > I would already assume any branch prefixed with 'wip' might be rebased >> > myself, but others might be surprised. >> >> I would like to have this documented somewhere so that people dont get >> surprised. I am not particularly fond of the wip-prefix though and >> would appreciate better suggestions. > >I think the common prefixes for these are pu/ and next/? These are >also documented somehow in the gitworkflows(7) man page.
The definition of those prefixes doesn't contain language like "might be rebased and force-pushed any time". Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834