On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:04:14 +0200, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>
wrote:
>On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 13:07:09 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote:
>> > > How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can be force
>> > > pushed any time and people pulling from those branches should be
>> > > expected to handle that?
>> >
>> > This would be useful.
>> >
>> > I would already assume any branch prefixed with 'wip' might be rebased
>> > myself, but others might be surprised.
>> 
>> I would like to have this documented somewhere so that people dont get
>> surprised. I am not particularly fond of the wip-prefix though and
>> would appreciate better suggestions.
>
>I think the common prefixes for these are pu/ and next/? These are
>also documented somehow in the gitworkflows(7) man page.

The definition of those prefixes doesn't contain language like "might
be rebased and force-pushed any time".

Greetings
Marc
-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834

Reply via email to