On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:10 PM Jonathan Carter <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 2020/01/21 16:43, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > This note doesn't make sense. It's either entirely invalid or so poorly > > written that it's useless. As the author of the code in question, I've > > been unable to ascertain what the note is about, and an email to the note > > author hasn't yielded any understanding. > > Well, if that's the way you approach them then you shouldn't at all be > surprised if you don't get a response.
My approach to it was actually: """ Hi Chris, I noticed you added the following comment to the reproducible-notes repo. Why? What is the significance of this? How does it relate to reproducible builds? What is your observation about this code exactly? Thanks, Jason """ I received a reply about not providing "private support" and given a place to comment online. When I clicked that, I was then required to make a "-guest" account using my email address on a website. Seemed a bit high overhead. The comment itself doesn't indicate to me (upstream) much at all, and a pretty ordinary attempt to figure out what it means didn't yield much. Seems like removal is in good order. Jason
