Hi, Yes, do it, thanks!
Cheers, Xavier Le 9 novembre 2020 22:08:46 GMT+01:00, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> a écrit : >Hi Utkarsh and Xavier, > >On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:08 AM Utkarsh Gupta <utka...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Sudip, >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Sudip Mukherjee >> <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > While going through packages to find autopkgtests which are >> > superficial I noticed that some of of the javascript packages are >> > doing just: >> > nodejs -e "require('foo.js');" >> > >> > After reading the documentation at [1], it seems that it will just >> > load the object in cache so that the exported properties and methods >> > of the object can be used in the code. >> > Can you please confirm if my understanding is correct and the tests >> > are indeed superficial in nature as it is just loading the object and >> > not actually using any of the exported methods or properties. >> >> You're indeed correct and these are just superficial test which just >> helps in the preliminary check that things are in order (syntax wise >> and that the module can be used and loaded). >> From what I remember, most of these (at least from a bunch of those >> that I have touched) are already marked as superficial. In case we can >> get a list of tests that aren't yet superficial, fixing them should be >> trivial! :) >> >> Thanks for all your work on this! \o/ > >Thanks to both of you for the confirmation. I have attached the list. >Do you want me to add them in my MBF list and raise bug reports for >them? > > >-- >Regards >Sudip -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.