mån 2021-05-24 klockan 20:45 +0200 skrev Timo Röhling: > Hi Simon! > > * Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> [2021-05-24 19:34]: > > I want to upload a new upstream libidn release into Debian, but > > upstream > > has done a shared library transition. > You should probably read the Release Team documentation [1] on > library transitions if you haven't done so already.
Thanks -- I will take a look. > > Is the first step on the transition to provide a libidn-dev package > > experimental (and after the release, unstable) and make all reverse > > build-dependencies use it? > Generally, it is a good idea to have a libidn-dev package instead of > libidn11-dev, so +1 on that. It will avoid sourceful uploads of > reverse-dependencies in the future. Indeed. > However, I noticed that Debian ships with the successor library > libidn2 already, and its homepage says it provides a compatibility > layer for libidn. So wouldn't it be better to sunset libidn in favor > of the new version? It would, but there are still some valid reasons for using libidn (e.g., stringprep), and I doubt all dependencies will be able to migrate before bullseye+1. I will include a comment about this in the bugs I file, maybe some of the reverse dependencies should just stop using libidn instead. Still, they need to be modified anyway. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
