On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:03:48PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Asking on #debian-systemd, Marco d'Itri suggested, that we move
> libsystemd-shared into a separate binary package. This would only help, if
> we moved libsystemd-shared into a Multi-Arch location (which means, we'd
> have to carry a patch against upstream). It would also mean, that on every
> new upstream release, systemd would have to go through NEW.
> So I'm not very keen on doing that.
Why do you think? libsystemd-shared is a perfectly valid package name
and it does not change.
However, if you call it libsystemd-shared-249, it is supposed to be
stable.
Bastian
--
Is truth not truth for all?
-- Natira, "For the World is Hollow and I have Touched
the Sky", stardate 5476.4.
