On Jun 22, Lance Lin <lqi...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Yes, from my understanding it is a "drop in" replacement for OpenSSL. One of > my packages (Workflow) uses it but can also use OpenSSL. > > I think this package will be beneficial to the Workflow users and downstream > OS's. Can you explain exactly what benefits these users have from using BabaSSL instad of OpenSSL? And why only these users and not the users of other current dependencies of OpenSSL?
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
