On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:58:56 +0200 Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Package: faker,ruby-faker
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid bookworm
> > User: trei...@debian.org
> > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
> > Control: found -1 0.9.3-0.1
> > Control: found -1 2.20.0-1
> > 
> > [...]
> > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
> > (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
> > slightly out of sync):
> > 
> >   /usr/bin/faker
> > 
> > This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of
> > the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
> > resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package.
> I'm posting to d-devel because I failed to make contact with the
> Ruby Team directly:
> 
> ruby-faker primarily ships a Ruby module while faker's sole purpose
> is the faker executable, so I believe ruby-faker should yield.
> There are two reverse dependencies:
> 
> - ruby-devise-two-factor builds fine without /usr/bin/faker in
>   ruby-faker
> 
> - ruby-omniauth-openid-connect FTBFS for unrelated reasons with and
>   wihout /usr/bin/faker
> 
> If the Ruby Team agrees with my analysis, I'd appreciate it if
> someone could upload a fixed version (I am not a team member).

I just did that. Remember that you need to add Breaks:/Replaces: on your
package for upgrades to work.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to