Hi,
What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like
helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and
acceptance) of QT?
As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard
choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you can
generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the
browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet
supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double check this
information!)
The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the mainstream
Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting for it. (Even
my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still in
unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like me to find
other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.
Best regards,
Imre
2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:
I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.
Thanks for your time.
QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page
web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be
more accessible than a QT app even today.
I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with linux
desktop accessibility, although both are usable.