>>>>> "Helmut" == Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> writes:
Helmut> I concur. Given Simon's analysis and the replies even when
Helmut> combined with earlier messages, I now see significantly more
Helmut> voices for the opinion:
Helmut> i386 primarily exists for running legacy binaries and
Helmut> binary compatibility with legacy executables is more
Helmut> important than correct representation of time beyond 2038.
Helmut> I'm inclined to call this consensus now and therefore ask
Helmut> those that do not agree with it to reply here - even if your
Helmut> reply is only stating that you disagree. As such, I think we
Helmut> can skip the GR part unless we get (5?) disagreeing replies
Helmut> here.
I agree this represents consensus of the thread here.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
