On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:09:40AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 13:54 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > I am late to the party but as i mentioned a couple times on debian-mips > > already i'd like to keep mipsel as a debian-port - and i'd like to > > revert away from mips32r2 back to mips2/mips3 - That change (with > > stretch) basically dropped all of the supported platforms formerly > > supported without a good reason - mips32r2 cpus would have been > > able to run mips2 code. The now supported platforms are > > basically non existent or available for the normal user. > > That sounds like a new port would be needed, >...
No, that's not required. We've already had baseline lowering in ports in the past (and could do that even for a release architecture) by changing the default in gcc and then binNMUing all packages. > bye, > pabs cu Adrian